Search for: "Thomas v. Abbott Laboratories Inc. et al"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2009, 10:33 am
Parke-Davis, Division of Warner-Lambert/Pfizer Thomas Cona et. al. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
(quoting BMW, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(Afro-IP) New Zealand Haka war dance now covered by intellectual property (Techdirt) Nigeria Nigerian musicians want payment for music played on airplanes (Afro-IP) Poland PARIS-DAKAR seeks to invalidate world trade mark registration for DAKAR by Polish company by the same name (Class 46) South Africa Delays at the SA registry favour trade mark proprietor: Golden Fried Chicken (Pty) Ltd v Soulsa CC (Afro-IP) Spain Exhaustion of trade… [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands… [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
